Difference: RefGeneqPCR (1 vs. 6)

Revision 62022-07-19 - KateElston

 
META TOPICPARENT name="QPCR"
<<Return to qPCR page

Reference Gene qPCR

Goals

  • Determine which of your reference genes you are going to normalize to.

Why am I doing this?

Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values. Reference genes should always be validated before you use them in your experiments.

Typical plate setup for three candidate reference genes with three technical replicates for each biological sample:

Refprimerplate.png

*C1 = Condition 1, C2 = Condition 2, and BR# = Biological Replicate

Template Material

Changed:
<
<
>
>
Added:
>
>
Note: Once you've diluted all of your cDNA samples store them at 4°C to avoid complications with freeze/thaw
  What you are looking for

  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2. This confirms the accuracy of your results.

Analysis

There is no detailed analysis for this step. Look for references that match the "what you are looking for" criteria and select:

  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low, preferrably less than 0.5.

If you are seeing differences between replicates and conditions, it is likely due to technical issues encountered when setting up the qPCR plate. The first few times you run qPCR the results can be messy, and sometimes you have to redo things to get accurate results. That being said, if you're a qPCR pro, or if you keep getting the same results over and over you may have to design primers for a new reference.

<<Return to qPCR page

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Refprimerplate.png" attr="h" comment="" date="1582235087" name="Refprimerplate.png" path="Refprimerplate.png" size="102909" stream="Refprimerplate.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp43424" user="KateElston" version="2"

Revision 52020-08-05 - KateElston

 
META TOPICPARENT name="QPCR"
<<Return to qPCR page

Reference Gene qPCR

Goals

  • Determine which of your reference genes you are going to normalize to.

Why am I doing this?

Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values. Reference genes should always be validated before you use them in your experiments.

Typical plate setup for three candidate reference genes with three technical replicates for each biological sample:

Refprimerplate.png

*C1 = Condition 1, C2 = Condition 2, and BR# = Biological Replicate

Template Material

What you are looking for

  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2. This confirms the accuracy of your results.
Deleted:
<
<
  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low, preferrably less than 0.5.
  • If you are seeing differences between replicates and conditions, it is likely due to technical issues encountered when setting up the qPCR plate. The first few times you run qPCR the results can be messy, and sometimes you have to redo things to get accurate results. That being said, if you're a qPCR pro, or if you keep getting the same results over and over you may have to design primers for a new reference.
 
Added:
>
>

Analysis

There is no detailed analysis for this step. Look for references that match the "what you are looking for" criteria and select:

  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low, preferrably less than 0.5.

If you are seeing differences between replicates and conditions, it is likely due to technical issues encountered when setting up the qPCR plate. The first few times you run qPCR the results can be messy, and sometimes you have to redo things to get accurate results. That being said, if you're a qPCR pro, or if you keep getting the same results over and over you may have to design primers for a new reference.

 <<Return to qPCR page

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Refprimerplate.png" attr="h" comment="" date="1582235087" name="Refprimerplate.png" path="Refprimerplate.png" size="102909" stream="Refprimerplate.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp43424" user="KateElston" version="2"

Revision 42020-04-09 - KateElston

 
META TOPICPARENT name="QPCR"
<<Return to qPCR page

Reference Gene qPCR

Goals

  • Determine which of your reference genes you are going to normalize to.

Why am I doing this?

Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values. Reference genes should always be validated before you use them in your experiments.

Changed:
<
<
Typical plate setup for three candidate reference genes:
>
>
Typical plate setup for three candidate reference genes with three technical replicates for each biological sample:
  Refprimerplate.png

*C1 = Condition 1, C2 = Condition 2, and BR# = Biological Replicate

Template Material

What you are looking for

  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2. This confirms the accuracy of your results.
  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low, preferrably less than 0.5.
  • If you are seeing differences between replicates and conditions, it is likely due to technical issues encountered when setting up the qPCR plate. The first few times you run qPCR the results can be messy, and sometimes you have to redo things to get accurate results. That being said, if you're a qPCR pro, or if you keep getting the same results over and over you may have to design primers for a new reference.

<<Return to qPCR page

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Refprimerplate.png" attr="h" comment="" date="1582235087" name="Refprimerplate.png" path="Refprimerplate.png" size="102909" stream="Refprimerplate.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp43424" user="KateElston" version="2"

Revision 32020-04-09 - JuliePerreau

 
META TOPICPARENT name="QPCR"
<<Return to qPCR page

Reference Gene qPCR

Goals

  • Determine which of your reference genes you are going to normalize to.

Why am I doing this?

Changed:
<
<
Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values, reference genes should always be validated before you use them in your experiments!
>
>
Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values.
Added:
>
>
Reference genes should always be validated before you use them in your experiments.
  Typical plate setup for three candidate reference genes:

Refprimerplate.png

*C1 = Condition 1, C2 = Condition 2, and BR# = Biological Replicate

Changed:
<
<
Template Material_
>
>
Template Material
 

What you are looking for

Changed:
<
<
  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2 (this confirms the accuracy of your results).
  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low. (Preferrably Less than 0.5)
  • If you are seeing differences between replicates or perhaps conditions, the main issue is likely from setting up the qPCR plate itself. The first few times you run qPCR the results can be messy and sometimes you just have to redo things to get accurate results. That being said, if you're a qPCR pro, or if you keep getting the same results over and over you may have to design primers for a new reference.
>
>
  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2. This confirms the accuracy of your results.
  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low, preferrably less than 0.5.
  • If you are seeing differences between replicates and conditions, it is likely due to technical issues encountered when setting up the qPCR plate. The first few times you run qPCR the results can be messy, and sometimes you have to redo things to get accurate results. That being said, if you're a qPCR pro, or if you keep getting the same results over and over you may have to design primers for a new reference.
 

<<Return to qPCR page

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Refprimerplate.png" attr="h" comment="" date="1582235087" name="Refprimerplate.png" path="Refprimerplate.png" size="102909" stream="Refprimerplate.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp43424" user="KateElston" version="2"

Revision 22020-02-20 - KateElston

 
META TOPICPARENT name="QPCR"
<<Return to qPCR page

Reference Gene qPCR

Goals

  • Determine which of your reference genes you are going to normalize to.

Why am I doing this?

Changed:
<
<
Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values and that is worthless. This is a common omission. Reference genes must be validated.
>
>
Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values, reference genes should always be validated before you use them in your experiments!
  Typical plate setup for three candidate reference genes:
Changed:
<
<

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

>
>
Refprimerplate.png
 
Changed:
<
<
A
>
>
*C1 = Condition 1, C2 = Condition 2, and BR# = Biological Replicate
Deleted:
<
<
 
Changed:
<
<
C1BR1
>
>
Template Material_
Deleted:
<
<
 
Changed:
<
<
C1BR1
>
>
Deleted:
<
<
 
Changed:
<
<
C1BR1
>
>
What you are looking for
Deleted:
<
<
 
Changed:
<
<
C1BR1
>
>
  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2 (this confirms the accuracy of your results).
  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low. (Preferrably Less than 0.5)
Added:
>
>
  • If you are seeing differences between replicates or perhaps conditions, the main issue is likely from setting up the qPCR plate itself. The first few times you run qPCR the results can be messy and sometimes you just have to redo things to get accurate results. That being said, if you're a qPCR pro, or if you keep getting the same results over and over you may have to design primers for a new reference.
 
Deleted:
<
<
C1BR1
 
Changed:
<
<
C1BR1
>
>
<<Return to qPCR page
Deleted:
<
<
 
Deleted:
<
<
C1BR1
 
Deleted:
<
<
C1BR1
 
Deleted:
<
<
C1BR1
 
Deleted:
<
<
B
 
Changed:
<
<
C1BR2
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Refprimerplate.png" attr="h" comment="" date="1582235087" name="Refprimerplate.png" path="Refprimerplate.png" size="102909" stream="Refprimerplate.png" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp43424" user="KateElston" version="2"
Deleted:
<
<

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

D

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

E

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

F

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

G

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

H

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

I

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

J

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

ref gene 1

ref gene 2

ref gene 3

C1 = CONDITION 1

C2 = CONDITION 2

BR# = BIOLOGICAL REPLICATE #

Conditions

What you are looking for

  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2 (this is arbitrary and most of your replicates will be below 0.1. If you do enough qPCR, you will eventually become obsessed with how low you can get this number).
  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low. (Preferrably Less than 0.5)
  • If you are seeing differences between replicates or perhaps conditions, you may be asking the question “how do I know if there’s really a difference, it could be something else like loading or RT-PCR efficiency? I am not controlling for any of these by normalizing to anything!”. The answer is if you prepared good quality RNA and loaded exactly the same amount of RNA into a well-prepared reverse transcription, there should be very little (less than 1 Cq) difference between biological replicates of the same condition, assuming that condition itself is reproducible. If the biological variation is truly large between replicates, you’ll have to pick the best you can.

<<Return to qPCR page

 

Revision 12019-03-21 - KateElston

 
META TOPICPARENT name="QPCR"
<<Return to qPCR page

Reference Gene qPCR

Goals

  • Determine which of your reference genes you are going to normalize to.

Why am I doing this?

Reference genes need to be stable across your control and experimental samples in order to be useful. If expression between the two differs, you will be normalizing to two different values and that is worthless. This is a common omission. Reference genes must be validated.

Typical plate setup for three candidate reference genes:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

A

C1BR1

C1BR1

C1BR1

C1BR1

C1BR1

C1BR1

C1BR1

C1BR1

C1BR1

B

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C1BR2

C

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

C1BR3

D

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

C1BR4

E

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

C1BR5

F

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

C2BR1

G

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

C2BR2

H

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

C2BR3

I

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

C2BR4

J

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

C2BR5

ref gene 1

ref gene 2

ref gene 3

C1 = CONDITION 1

C2 = CONDITION 2

BR# = BIOLOGICAL REPLICATE #

Conditions

What you are looking for

  • Technical replicates with a standard deviation below 0.2 (this is arbitrary and most of your replicates will be below 0.1. If you do enough qPCR, you will eventually become obsessed with how low you can get this number).
  • At least 2 reference primer sets that show no significant difference between control and experimental conditions. The standard deviation of the Cqs for all biological replicates should be low. (Preferrably Less than 0.5)
  • If you are seeing differences between replicates or perhaps conditions, you may be asking the question “how do I know if there’s really a difference, it could be something else like loading or RT-PCR efficiency? I am not controlling for any of these by normalizing to anything!”. The answer is if you prepared good quality RNA and loaded exactly the same amount of RNA into a well-prepared reverse transcription, there should be very little (less than 1 Cq) difference between biological replicates of the same condition, assuming that condition itself is reproducible. If the biological variation is truly large between replicates, you’ll have to pick the best you can.

<<Return to qPCR page

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback